This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: It's going to work, even if it kills me
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] It's going to work, even if it kills me
- From: "Tim" <xsl at cheekymail dot net>
- Date: 28 Jun 2001 09:05:06 -0000
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Thanks Guys, My wife gave birth 5 hours ago, si it maybe a while till I
get to try it out.....
>
>
> > "In theory xsl can do anything, but what exactly is your problem?" -
> > David Carlisle, from the XSL-list
>
> Did I really say that? Not one of my more helpful answers...
>
> Note that even if $keywords was a node set, doing
>
> <xsl:with-param name="keywords">
> <xsl:value-of select="$keywords"/>
> </xsl:with-param>
>
> would not pass a node set to the templates,
>
> Firstly value-of converts a node set to a string (by taking the string
> value of the first node, and discarding all other nodes)
>
> You could use copy-of instead, but then using xsl:with-param in
> a form with element content would convert that node set to a result
tree
> fragment. You can't query into a result tree fragment in standard XSLT
> (although most systems provide a node-set extension function to conver
> the rtf back to a node set)
>
> You want
> <xsl:with-param name="keywords" select="$keywords"/>
> then you pass in the node set.
>
> David
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
> delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
> information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively
call
> Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
>
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list