This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: RE: A simple solution (Was: Re: One for tomorrow :-) )
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: A simple solution (Was: Re: One for tomorrow :-) )
- From: David Carlisle <davidc at nag dot co dot uk>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 13:46:44 +0100
- References: <NEBBJGCDKMLHOAAONGKDGEANCDAA.daniel.newman@bis-web.net>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> So why isn't it working for me?
Life's like that.
> How can following-sibling::*[not(substring(.,string-length(.))=',')][4] not
> return just the forth node, but all nodes?
That can return at most one node.
probably though you are not seeing what you think you're seeing.
Post a small example (preferably without all that font stuff which is so
upsetting:-)
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list