This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: Reference to functions (Was: RE: XPath 2.0: Collection-Valued Expressions (Was: Re: XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators Version 1.0))
- To: jim dot melton at acm dot org
- Subject: [xsl] Re: Reference to functions (Was: RE: XPath 2.0: Collection-Valued Expressions (Was: Re: XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators Version 1.0))
- From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev at yahoo dot com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 22:41:13 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> While I want your needs to be met, yours are not the only needs
> under consideration. There are people/companies with demonstrated,
> articulated needs for a query language more powerful than XPath and we are
> trying to address those requirements, too. Trust me, I will not personally
> force you to use that new query language ;^) You are more than welcome to
> continue using XPath.
>
> With tongue firmly in cheek,
> Jim
Thank you once again. I will continue to use XPath. A logical conclusion from your
statement above is that there is a minor typo that has to be corrected -- will you
remove "XPath" from the title of the specification?
Very thankful and appreciating,
Dimitre.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list