RE: [xsl] Comparision of parsers

[Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian dot rahtz at computing-services dot oxford dot ac dot uk>]

Ross Kendall writes:
 > this is a comparison of a few XSLT processors under perl, it may not include
 > some of the processors that you would hope, nevertheless you will find some
 > of the performance info useful (even if you don't use perl)
 > 
 > http://iterx.org/xslt/performance.html

This is  highly misleading, as it omits libxslt, which is useable
through Perl, and is undoubtedly a fuller and faster implementation
than the other two

sebastian


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list