This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: XPath 2.0 is not XPath 2.0
- From: "David Rosenborg" <david dot rosenborg at pantor dot com>
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 12:21:06 +0100
- Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0 is not XPath 2.0
- References: <000101c189a5$4c4e17c0$465169d5@pcukmka>
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Mike Kay wrote:
> It's good to see comments on the drafts, but please do send your reactions
> to the official feedback address. Some members of both working groups read
> this list but not everyone does; and it's really best if what reaches the
> groups isn't filtered by people like me who will inevitably want to pass
> some comments on and not others.
Hmm, maybe it's just me, but I think it's pretty strange if not every member,
working actively with XSLT/XPath, monitor this list to at least some degree.
(BTW, I sent a copy to the XPath comments address, but it never showed up,
at least not in the archives, maybe there is some latency and/or moderator
sitting in between?)
Cheers
</David>
David Rosenborg
Pantor Engineering AB
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list