This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: XPath 2.0
- From: naha at ai dot mit dot edu
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 13:18:46 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: RE: [xsl] XPath 2.0
- References: <BNEMICIEADHDDOIKLHNCEELIFMAA.elenz@xyzfind.com>
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Quoting Evan Lenz :
> I've gotten used to typing < for "<", but it helps that there's some
> semantic association in the letters "lt" with the operator's actual
> function.
>
> Twice as bad, to me, would be if we were also required to type > for
> ">"
> (which people do anyway). "<<" is exponentially worse, IMHO.
To be accurate, it's only linearly worse. :-)
Maybe there should also be a standardized entity defined for "<<" to
econimize on the ampersands and semicolons.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list