This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: generate xsl 1.0 from 2.0 question
- From: "Michael Kay" <michael dot h dot kay at ntlworld dot com>
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 18:52:04 -0000
- Subject: RE: [xsl] generate xsl 1.0 from 2.0 question
- Keywords: xsltDEV
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com]On Behalf Of Bryan
> Rasmussen
> Sent: 23 January 2002 08:48
> To: xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
> Subject: [xsl] generate xsl 1.0 from 2.0 question
> anyway the thing I was wondering about is in the template
> name="click_here"
> you'll notice I do the $translator[@name='Click_here'] is
> there anyway to
> select the name of the template one is in(in xslt 2.0), in
> such a way that I
> could make a parameter holding the template/@name value and
> pass it to a named template through a call?
>
No. We basically haven't done anything that makes XSLT more dynamic (or
"reflexive") than it is an 1.0. There's been a lot of debate about an
evaluate() function, and some debate about dynamic names in call-template
and modes in apply-templates, and on the whole, there's a lot of resistance
from some implementors to moving in this direction because it greatly limits
the analysis you can do statically.
If you have comments on this, xsl-editors@w3.org is the place...
Mike Kay
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list