This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: evaluate() function in XPath 2.0 (Was: Re: Lookup (?))


At present the decision is to exclude the evaluate() function from the XSLT
2.0 specification.

Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@ntlworld.com
work: Michael.Kay@softwareag.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com]On Behalf Of
> Jeni Tennison
> Sent: 18 February 2002 17:24
> To: xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
> Subject: evaluate() function in XPath 2.0 (Was: Re: [xsl] Lookup (?))
>
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> > I might mention that the XSL WG has decided against including the
> > evaluate() function in the core function library for XSLT 2.0.
> > Despite its obvious usefulness, a majority of the group felt that
> > implementors should not be obliged to provide it, since it can
> > greatly increase the difficulty (and reduce the performance) of an
> > XSLT compiler.
>
> You say that the evaluate() function isn't going to be included in the
> *core* function library, but is it likely to be included as an
> optional part of XSLT? Even if not all processors implemented it, we'd
> still benefit from a standard definition for those that did.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeni
>
> ---
> Jeni Tennison
> http://www.jenitennison.com/
>
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]