This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: Q on incremental processing and count()
- From: "Perry Molendijk" <perry at inflexions dot com>
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 12:07:38 +0800
- Subject: Re: [xsl] Q on incremental processing and count()
- Organization: Inflexions (WA) Pty Ltd
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Infexions (WA) Pty LtdWouldn't give you the result you're after, no need for
count() etc..
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:output method="xml" version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" indent="yes"/>
<xsl:template match="/">
<html>
<head>
<title>unique news</title>
</head>
<body>
<xsl:apply-templates select="/table/row[position() mod 20 = 1]"/>
</body>
</html>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="row">
<table border="2" cellpadding="4">
<tr style="background-color:orange">
<th>table header</th>
</tr>
<xsl:for-each select=". | following-sibling::row[position() < 20]">
<tr>
<td>
<xsl:value-of select="."/>
</td>
</tr>
</xsl:for-each>
</table>
<p/>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
That seemed to work pretty well in MSXML 3, Saxon and Xalan
Perry
----- Original Message -----
From: "Enke Michael" <Michael.Enke@wincor-nixdorf.com>
To: <xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com>
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 10:30 PM
Subject: Re: [xsl] Q on incremental processing and count()
> Joerg Heinicke wrote:
> >
> > Hello Michael,
> >
> > it's not clear what you want to do. Your variables are ok, no problems
to
> > see. You only can shorten them:
> >
> > <xsl:variable name="col-num" select="10"/>
> >
> > <xsl:variable name="col-num" select="count(thead/th-row)"/>
> >
> > <xsl:variable name="col-num" select="count(thead[1]/th-row)"/>
> >
> > Between the two last declarations there should be no difference, because
of
> > your XML.
> >
> > But what exactly is the problem? What's the result you get and you
expect?
> > What's the context of the variable declaration?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Joerg
> >
> > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
> My problem is the execution speed.
> I have a large table (200 entries) and split them into small tables (per
> table 20 entries, every subtable with the same table header).
> My problem is: The browser gets the result if all 200 entries are
processed in
> the memory! Arrrrgggg...
> But I expected to see the tables as they come out of the database.
> Because for investigating I made it so, that every item needs half a
second
> to be generated.
> I expected to see the first sub table after 20*0.5 seconds, the second
table
> after 2*20*0.5 seconds and so on.
> But actually I see all tables not before 200*0.5 seconds :-(
>
> If I remove the count() and ...following-sibling... I lost my
> table structure but I can see how the values come out as they
> were produced.
>
> Regards,
> Michael
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list