This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: XSLT processor based on SAX
- From: "Rick Geimer" <Rick dot Geimer at nsc dot com>
- To: xsl-list <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Date: 09 Apr 2002 09:31:08 -0700
- Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT processor based on SAX
- Alternate-recipient: Allowed
- Conversion: Allowed
- Disclose-recipients: Prohibited
- Original-encoded-information-types: IA5-Text
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- X400-content-type: P2-1988 ( 22 )
- X400-mts-identifier: [/c=us/admd= /prmd=National/;0729A3CB3174C262-MTANSC1]
- X400-originator: Rick.Geimer@nsc.com
- X400-received: by mta MTANSC1 in /c=us/admd= /prmd=National/; Relayed;09 Apr 2002 09:31:08 -0700
- X400-received: by /c=us/admd= /prmd=National/; Relayed; 09 Apr 2002 09:31:08 -0700
- X400-recipients: non-disclosure;
> I'm looking for a XSLT processor based on SAX parser. I have
> to work with
> big XML files (400 Mb).
>
> Is there any implementation I can work with ?
> What's the best XSLT implementation (free or not free) I can
> use with big
> files ?
I'm sure other people will suggest this, but when you are dealing with a 400 Mb file, XSLT might not be the best choice. You might consider writing a custom conversion based on SAX events, or use something else that scales better to large files (OmniMark comes to mind).
Rick
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list