This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: XSLT/XPath 2.0 (was "Identifying two tags...")
- From: Evan Lenz <evan at evanlenz dot net>
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Cc: sara dot mitchell at ps dot ge dot com
- Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 13:09:52 -0700
- Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT/XPath 2.0 (was "Identifying two tags...")
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
On Monday, May 13, 2002, at 12:11 PM, Jeni Tennison wrote:
> Hi Sara,
<snip/>
> It's
> good to raise those concerns now, while the WGs are still considering
> which parts of, for example, XPath 2.0 are really necessary. I
> encourage you, and indeed everyone, to write to
> public-qt-comments@w3.org describing what parts you find particularly
> hard to understand and which parts you think are unnecessary.
I'd also add to Jeni's note that if you (or anyone else) are in favor of a
conformance level for XSLT 2.0 that does not require XML Schema validation,
we would like to hear about it, including any specific requirements for
what such a conformance level would entail. You may have a better chance
of success if you put your hopes in a conformance level, rather than
trying to fight the inclusion of XML Schemas altogether.
Evan Lenz
(speaking for himself only, not for the XSL WG)
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list