RE: [xsl] James Clark on Schema

["bryan" <bry at itnisk dot com>]

J.Pietschmann said :

>Interesting question: does the example above support the
>view that data types are actually important or the view that
>the only data type that really matters is "string" and
>everything else is optional?

Well I think it indicates that strings are a lot easier to structure.
Xml Schema seems to think so too, for example if I want to make my own
datattype for currency that can have a form #,###,###.## or #.###.###,##
I'm basically left restricting xsd:string by a regular expression - and
what fun that is. 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list