RE: [xsl] fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper

[DPawson at rnib dot org dot uk]

> > if you specify long inlines, then you need to account for overflows.
> > 
> 
> David,
> 
> inlines do break accross lines, and nothing is wrong in it. They do it
> nicely in XEP.

rec 6.6.7
The fo:inline formatting object generates one or more normal inline-areas. 

But if the content of an inline is only pcdata, does the formatter still
break it David?
I thought not?

4.7.2, 3rd para seems to imply the formatter does this when building up line
areas to form a block.

4th para gives one exception

Forced line-breaks are respected. Specifically, if A is the glyph-area
generated by a fo:character whose Unicode character is U+000A, then A must
be the last area in its containing subset Si.






 I just don't think the problem is with the inlines; I'm
> waiting for the code example.


<grin/> I thought there was something else there!

regards DaveP

- 

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, 
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your 
system.

RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any 
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are 
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email 
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list