This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper
- From: David Tolpin <dvd at renderx dot com>
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:51:39 +0500 (AMST)
- Subject: Re: [xsl] fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
>
> Does this mean then, that if I have a structure like this:
>
> fo:wrapper
> fo:block
> /fo:block
> fo:block span="all"
> /fo:block
> fo:block
> /fo:block
> /fo:wrapper
>
> in a two-column page that the fo:block with span="all" should then be
> able to span without a problem?
>
The recommendation is clear on this issue; it states
that span="all" only works on areas returned by a flow;
and then the answer to your question is 'yes, it should'.
In the upcoming release of XEP (with implementation of span among
other things) it spans without a problem :-)
David
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list