This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: preceding-sibling reversed ?
- From: David Carlisle <davidc at nag dot co dot uk>
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:45:59 +0100
- Subject: Re: [xsl] preceding-sibling reversed ?
- References: <NFBBLPOOBBDCPGMGEKIOMEIGEPAA.boxstart@dcdds.nl>
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
you just want
<xsl:value-of select="preceding-sibling::div[@class = 'slide'][1]/@id
to get the nearest previous sibling with slide class.
what you have
<xsl:value-of select="preceding-sibling::div[@class = 'slide' and
position() = 1]/@id
selects the nearest sibling if it has a slide class and nothing
otherwise. If all your div elements have a class="silde" then these are
equivalent, otherwise not.
in the step
preceding-sibling::div
you are in a reverse axis, so all teh selected nodes are numbered in
reverse document order.
so your filter
[@class = 'slide' and position() = 1]
selects all (at most one) of those nodes that satisify the stated
condition.
however if you do it with two filters first
preceding-sibling::div[@class = 'slide']
now the resulting node set is renumbered (still in reverse order, as you
are still in the same step) so now the [1] or equivalenetly [position()
= 1] selcts the first of _these_ elements, ie the first element (looking
back) with class slide.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list