This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: tag minimisation
- From: "Américo Albuquerque" <aalbuquerque at viseu dot ipiaget dot pt>
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:32:17 +0100
- Subject: RE: [xsl] tag minimisation
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Hi.
The following elements don't 'inherit' the style, they are simply put
'inside' the <div/> element
So, to a web browser
<div style="font-weight:bold"/>
<div>foo</div>
is the same as
<div style="font-weight:bold">
<div>foo</div>
</div>
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
[mailto:owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Welch
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 4:27 PM
To: Xsl-List (E-mail)
Subject: [xsl] tag minimisation
When elements like <div></div> get minimised by the processor to <div/>
it's *really* frustrating.
I cannot stress how annoying it is to find that because you have an
element in your data that is empty, you get a minimised ouput element
where all following elements 'inherit' the style...
For example:
<div style="font-weight:bold"/>
<div>foo</div>
will give you a bold 'foo'.
I appreciate that html/css is at fault, but surely its easy to add a
minimisation='no' extension until browsers catch up...? That or
continue the advice of 'add a space to the end of the element to prevent
it getting minimised'...
At the moment I can see no real benefit of enforcing minimisation.
cheers
andrew
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.385 / Virus Database: 217 - Release Date: 04/09/2002
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list