This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: [PATCH] X86: Add pseudo prefixes to control encoding


On 11/11/2016 10:24 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:

Sure, but I think the instruction length specification would still be *very*
useful in some cases to lock things down (and document the length
dependency).

Instruction length can a vague constraint:

   0: c4 e1 78 28 50 00     vmovaps 0x0(%rax),%xmm2
   6: 62 f1 7c 08 28 10     vmovaps (%rax),%xmm2

Both instructions with the same length do the same thing.
But one is AVX and the other is AVX512.

   c: c4 e1 78 28 10       vmovaps (%rax),%xmm2
  11: c5 f8 28 50 00       vmovaps 0x0(%rax),%xmm2

These 2 are AVX.  Majority of programmers don't care how
an instruction is encoded.  If they want specific instruction
length, they can experiment with pseudo prefixes to get
exactly what they need.

Oh, I didn't intend this as a replacement, just as an additional possibility.

Florian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]