This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.
Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 22
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 05:55:19PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 07:40:21AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >Just a lemma: end users are advised to use setup.exe to install cygwin.
> >
> >They do __not__ see contrib vs latest.
>
> Right. Good point! This whole contrib argument is really a non-issue
> in this light.
>
What's the point in having contrib then if it doesn't mean anything ?
Not everyone will use setup.exe.
> I also don't understand this talk about "forking". Chuck has made a
> libz available from the original sources at info-zip.org. This is by
> no means an XFree86 package. It was developed by the author of gzip.
> It lives here:
>
I don't understand the forking issue either.
> http://www.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/zlib/
>
> Chuck provided a generic port of the package for use with Cygwin. IMO,
> this is what this project should be using.
>
I agree here. Any application should use operating system provided libraries
rather than building it's own. That was the original reason for the patch
to use cygwin's provided one. I only reversed it as the zlib for cygwin
was in contrib.
In light of cygipc too, which is really in contrib land, I suggest we
put it back. Especially being that the next XFree86 release is due very soon and
many more users will probably download the new Cygwin/XFree86. We have
a chance to correct the zlib situation.
It's a one off thing. Let's get it right now and suffer a few emails (and
put it in the FAQ), that people need to get the zlib from contrib to use
Cygwin/XFree86. We probably stand to get more questions on which cygz.dll or
libz.dll they should be using otherwise.
Are we expecting to build the next full release with cygipc ? If so, then
that should be made aware in the FAQ too.
A