This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: cygwin on 95 slower than NT
- To: Paul Sokolovsky <paul-ml at is dot lg dot ua>
- Subject: Re: cygwin on 95 slower than NT
- From: Chris Faylor <cgf at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 08:41:30 -0500
- Cc: Fraxinus <fraxinus at home dot se>, cygwin at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <007701bf3ab4$96b26060$500616ac@storebror> <8609.991130@is.lg.ua>
- Reply-To: cygwin at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 02:38:02PM +0200, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
>Hello Fraxinus,
>
>Fraxinus <fraxinus@home.se> wrote:
>
>F> Isnt it that all console programs under '95 runs slower. I noticed it first
>F> in batch files...
>
> Of course they're slower. But how much slower? I bet they're
>hundred times slower (in screen output, of course) than DOS apps
>(djgpp's, for example). But why make them times more slower?
>Aproximative tests:
>
>ls'ing directory with 256 entries (all dirs) (seconds)
>
>ls
> pw32 win95/P5-100/24 0.7
> linux 2.0 P5-150/48 0.02
> Cygwin b20.1 win95/P5-100/24 2.42
>
>ls -l
> pw32 win95/P5-100/24 5.42
> linux 2.0 P5-150/48 2.82
> Cygwin b20.1 win95/P5-100/24 13.28
>
>where pw32 is my implementation
Patches to correct this problem are gratefully accepted.
cgf
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com