This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: apache problems gone with 1.50
Stipe Tolj <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in
in gmane.os.cygwin on Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:51:18 +0200:
Andrew DeFaria <ADeFaria@Salira.com>:
> > This is good to hear. Perhaps I will switch from Apache for Windows ->
> > Apache under Cygwin. Only problem is I also trying to move my web site
> > over to a Linux box instead - which makes this all kinda moot. However I
> > do have a friend who wishes to host his web site on a Windows box and I
> > am contemplating using Cygwin for most services. If Apache under Cygwin
> > works well with 1.5.0 then perhaps I'll just go that way. I wonder if
> > anybody has measured the speed difference between Apache for Windows and
> > Apache under Cygwin...
> I did some time ago. It was almost 35-40% slower on Apache for Cygwin
> then his native (win32) counterpart.
> Plain html file requests, no php or any other "magic".
Andrew might want to consider compiling Cygwin-Apache with the native
Winsock option. This way it still lives in the Cygwin file system
space so has the POSIX/Linux style configuration files but bypasses
the Cygwin Berkeley->Winsock socket API translation. Apparently this
(But I suspect the majority of the performance difference Stipe has
found is the use of threads in the native Windows version against
forking child processes in the *X versions which is a more expensive
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html