RE: Windows 95 support ?

["Gary R. Van Sickle" <g dot r dot vansickle at worldnet dot att dot net>]

> From: Brian Dessent
> 
> "Gary R. Van Sickle" wrote:
> 
> > Looking through the source tarball brings up another issue though: 
> > there's no copy of the GPL included with the source, nor 
> could I find 
> > one pending in cvs for an upcoming release.  I took the liberty to 
> > include a copy in SetupInstaller.exe; it gets installed in the 
> > installation directory as "LICENSE_FOR_SETUP_EXE".  Doesn't help 
> > anybody downloading the sources though....
> 
> I added a copy of the GPL as COPYING to CVS just now.

Excellent, thanks Brian.

>  I hope 
> that's kosher -- the project was always licensed that way 
> anyway per the headers on each file.
> 
> Brian

Right, no, I didn't mean to imply that it wasn't covered properly, just
perhaps a bit incompletely.  The source anyway - it still seems to me that
the EXE needs at least a notice of some sort.

-- 
Gary R. Van Sickle
 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/