This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: [ mingw-Patches-1789093 ] Modernize mingw10.dll build procedure
- From: Danny Smith <dannysmith at clear dot net dot nz>
- To: 'Charles Wilson' <cwilso11 at users dot sourceforge dot net>
- Cc: mingw-users at lists dot sourceforge dot net, 'Cygwin Mailing List' <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:47:40 +1200
- Subject: RE: [ mingw-Patches-1789093 ] Modernize mingw10.dll build procedure
> From: Charles Wilson
> Sent: Saturday, 26 April 2008 2:05 p.m.
>
> SourceForge.net wrote:
> > Patches item #1789093, was opened at 2007-09-06 14:33
> >
> > Comment By: Danny Smith (dannysmith)
> > Date: 2008-04-25 17:42
> >
> > Ping!
>
> Danny, you'd do better to ping the main mingw [and cygwin] lists.
>
> Comments on sf bugs go to the originator (me -- and I can't
> do anything
> about it, or I already would have) and to the assignee (e.g. no-one).
I would have thought that most active developers were suscribed to the mingw-notify lists:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-notify
for bugs and patches.
Can we have a default assignee for build machinery bugs/patches?
>
> I've copied this message to both lists.
>
Thanks for the cover.
Danny
> Original bug report with patch:
> > As discussed in this thread:
> >
> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.mingw.user/23721
> >
> > The current build procedure for mingw10.dll produces a DLL
> with duplicate .reloc sections. According to
> >
> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.mingw.user/23739
> >
> > the patch posted here (and attached to this tracker):
> >
> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.mingw.user/23737
> >
> > corrects this problem.
>
>
> --
> Chuck
>
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/