Re: .exe magic reloaded 2

[Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>]

On Sep 15 15:50, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Sep 15 15:38, Al wrote:
> > >
> > > True. ÂIn theory we would have to remove .exe and .lnk suffixes from
> > > directory listings as well, but that was never the case in Cygwin.
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > That's the way it has always been... isn't a strong argument in development.
> 
> It wasn't an argument, it was just a description of the state.
> 
> > I guess there are some other reasons to do it this way. If not one
> > should really consider to improve it to make Cygwin still more Unix
> > compatible.
> 
> I'd love to drop the .exe suffix from readdir(), I'm just not sure what
> unwelcome side-effects we create.

For instance, this one:  Either we always remove the .exe suffix from
a file, or we have to check for each file with a .exe suffix, whether
it's executable or not.

In the first case, you get something like this:

  $ echo foo > bar.exe
  $ ls bar*
  bar
  $

Fortunately:

  $ ls bar.exe
  bar.exe

However, dependent of the intelligence of a script or application, the
suddenly missing suffix could result in trouble.

In the second case, the extra test for executability would be a big
performance hit, especially if you call `ls /usr/bin'.  And you know how
we already have a lot of users kicking our asses for Cygwin's
performance.

So, whatever we do will result in problems for another group of users.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple