This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: NetAPP / cygwin 1.7.7-1 avoid Recycle BIN dot files
- From: "koerner dot sebastian at t-online dot de" <koerner dot sebastian at t-online dot de>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:32:37 +0100
- Subject: Re: NetAPP / cygwin 1.7.7-1 avoid Recycle BIN dot files
- References: <20101117153803.GB11144@calimero.vinschen.de>
- Reply-to: "koerner dot sebastian at t-online dot de" <koerner dot sebastian at t-online dot de>
Hello Corinna,
Oh, btw. In your OP you claimed that you have netapps for which Cygwin
returns "cifs" and other netapps for which Cygwin returns "vfat" as
filesystem. The above one is clearly one of the "cifs" type.
Here's the question: Do you *really* have some for which the latest
Cygwin 1.7.7 or the latest snapshot returns "vfat" and are they *really*
netapps? In theory I'd expect that those are just remote FAT FS on some
remote Windows machine, and they shouldn't be affected by the reported
problem.
I just checked and think I must have something mixed up.
Under 1.7.7-1 both netapps are listed in "mount" as cifs and in getVolInfo as FAT with pretty much the same attribute set.
If wonder: If this really is a netapp Bug - are you in contact with them?
Best regards
Sebastian
----------------------------------------------------------------
Ohne Brief, aber mit Siegel. Mit Telekom De-Mail vertraulich und rechtsverbindlich online kommunizieren. Jetzt registrieren! www.telekom.de/de-mail
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple