This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-7.3.1152-1


The special handling of vi is just fine.
The whole problem is that not only the vi behaviour changed, but also
the vim behaviour.
Which is why I suggested the solutions I suggested.

2013/12/9 Frank Fesevur <ffes@users.sourceforge.net>:
> 2013/12/9 Björn Kautler:
>> Again, what I talk about is NOT an issue of vi vs. vim.
>> What I talk about is a breaking change in vim that was introduced
>> while doing a change for vi.
>> But it is NOT an issue of vi vs. vim.
>
> That patch was introduced when people started to complain that they
> got errors about commands not recognized in their vimrc. The root
> cause of this was obviously the whole vi != vim thing.
>
> I always use ~/.vimrc so I never ran into your problem.
>
> Regards,
> Frank
>
> --
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]