This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: get rid of getpwent? (Was: cygwin-1.7.28 getpwent header declaration changes ?)
- From: Warren Young <warren at etr-usa dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 02:02:27 -0700
- Subject: Re: get rid of getpwent? (Was: cygwin-1.7.28 getpwent header declaration changes ?)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <52F339CA dot 5070305 at gmail dot com> <20140206090117 dot GD2821 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <52F361C5 dot 3000807 at gmail dot com> <20140206141321 dot GI2821 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <52F40208 dot 5030901 at etr-usa dot com> <20140207094917 dot GN2821 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <52F4E540 dot 2010606 at tiscali dot co dot uk> <52F51D19 dot 6080807 at etr-usa dot com> <31347914-BB4F-4039-984B-731B6C72F903 at etr-usa dot com> <52F7AEC5 dot 5090205 at tiscali dot co dot uk>
On Feb 9, 2014, at 9:37 AM, David Stacey <drstacey@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
> On 09/02/2014 15:45, Warren Young wrote:
>> Results:
>>
>> /bin/cppcheck.exe
>
> As far as I can tell, cppcheck doesn't actually call getpwent() at all; this is a false positive turned up by strings(1).
Yeah, there *has* to be a better way than strings(1) to extract an EXE's list of DLL imports. The linker does it somehow...
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple