This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Feb 10 23:05, Denis Excoffier wrote: > Hello, > > I use XP SP3 with 32 bits and also Seven 32 bits. Today i could exercise 4 new snapshots. > > The first two had the same problem (tested on XP): it seems that every program that has to perform something in connection with user/id/passwd etc. produces a stackdump (id, tar etc.). > > The last two (the last one is dated 18:34:44 UTC) had the same problem (first tested on XP, second on Seven): windows produces a message showing âbash.exeâ complaining that cygwin1.dll is not a valid windows image. > > After that, iâm back into 1.7.28-2 or snapshot-dated-20140209. But which one is the latest? Compare the following: > > With snapshot-dated-20140909, cat /proc/version | tr â\100â âZâ produces: > CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 version 1.7.29s(0.271/5/3) (cgfZ) (gcc version 4.7.3 20130411 (Fedora Cygwin 4.7.3-1) (GCC) ) 20140209 18:32:26 > while cygwin-1.7.28-2 produces: > CYGWIN_NT-5.1 version 1.7.28(0.271/5/3) (corinnaZcalimero.vinschen.de) (gcc version 4.8.2 20131016 (Fedora Cygwin 4.8.2-2) (GCC) ) 2014-02-09 21:06 > > Ok, the first one is from Seven, the second one is from XP. But, since this is local time, itâs perhaps ok that the time of 1.7.29s is _before_ 1.7.28-2. But what for the > format of this `uname -v` part? Dashes or not? Seconds or not? 1.7.28-2 has been specificially created as a bugfix release, after we had already bumped the version number in CVS, so the release date is nothing to worry about. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
Attachment:
pgpDSjk4uhQfY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |