Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs

[Ken Brown <kbrown at cornell dot edu>]

On 9/11/2014 6:21 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
> Achim Gratz wrote:
> > Both fonts you use as an example exist in multiple versions with
> > differing UTF-8 support.  If they don't have that glyph (which is
> > likely, given the results you report), then Emacs would try to get it
> > from another font with the same dimensions (I don't know if mintty
> > does font substitution and if so, how) and the results very much
> > depend on the font maps used.
>
> I didn't know about that mechanism. But, then, the question is: why does
> Windows Emacs find a substitution, and not Cygwin Emacs (for the same
> font)?

It's clear that I was wrong when I said that this doesn't seem to have 
anything to do with emacs.  The problem might be that the Cygwin-w32 
build of emacs is a relatively recent invention and may still need some 
tweaking to get all the GUI features working properly.  If you or 
someone else is motivated enough, I'm sure it would be possible to 
figure out how the Windows build finds a glyph for characters that don't 
have one in the chosen font, and to port that to the Cygwin-w32 build. 
I'm copying Daniel Colascione, the author of that build, to see if he 
has any comments.  Dan, the thread starts here:

  https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-09/msg00052.html

Ken

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple