This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Problem with new acl code and cdrtools


On Feb  8 15:31, Ismail Donmez wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Corinna Vinschen
> <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com> wrote:
> > On Feb  8 12:01, Ismail Donmez wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> cdrtools has some code to detect Solaris style ACLs:
> >>
> >> #if defined(HAVE_ACL) && defined(HAVE_FACL) && \
> >>      defined(HAVE_ACLFROMTEXT) && defined(HAVE_ACLTOTEXT)
> >> #   define  HAVE_SUN_ACL    1 /* Sun UFS ACL's present */
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> Since cygwin still seems to be defining aclfromtext() and acltotext()
> >> functions (which are not defined in POSIX) cdrtools thinks this a
> >> Solaris-style system and get up getting a compile error later on.
> >
> > Probably due to including sys/acl.h.  Does swtiching to cygwin/acl.h
> > help?  Or changing the above check to prefer POSIX ACLs over Solaris
> > ACLs?
> 
> This is a generic code so I don't want to add a cygwin specific
> dependency there. Is there a preprocessor definition for cygwin
> version? I could use that to disable HAVE_SUN_ACL for cygwin 2.5+

If you include cygwin/version.h you could use the version definitions.

Alternatively we could allow to use the Solaris ACL functions even if
only including sys/acl.h, given some macro:

  sys/acl.h:

    #ifdef __USE_OLD_SOLARIS_ACL_FUNCTIONS
    # include <cygwin/acl.h>
    #else
      [...POSIX definitions...]
    #endif

Would that help?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]