[PATCH] Use __unused0 instead of __unused for user visible struct members

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Mon, 28 Oct 2013, Justin Cormack wrote:

> A patch was submitted for this a while back
> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-01/msg00001.html and did not
> get a good reception from the maintainer at the time. Attached is an
> updated version for current glibc head.

I believe we had consensus on use of __glibc_reserved as a prefix in such 
cases (allowing for __glibc_reserved0, __glibc_reserved1 or 
__glibc_reserved_foo, __glibc_reserved_bar in cases where more than one 
identifier, or a more meaningful name, is needed).

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com