mktemp and util-linux vs. new coreutils

[Eric Blake]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Charles, Yaakov,

Now that upstream coreutils 6.10 includes mktemp and arch as standard
programs, should we obsolete the mktemp package and reduce the scope of
the util-linux package?  I won't promote coreutils 6.10 to current until
we come to a decision (and I'm open to the alternative idea of not
shipping the coreutils version of these programs).

- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake             ebb9@byu.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHmRXb84KuGfSFAYARAqHuAJ4pUXY62wYm4M4bmg5rIzlWqRGvMgCfaWwE
JwqtSjbr1L0NbGWx+xDXq3o=
=lK+T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----