mktemp and util-linux vs. new coreutils

[Yaakov (Cygwin Ports)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Eric Blake wrote:
| Now that upstream coreutils 6.10 includes mktemp and arch as standard
| programs, should we obsolete the mktemp package and reduce the scope of
| the util-linux package?  I won't promote coreutils 6.10 to current until
| we come to a decision (and I'm open to the alternative idea of not
| shipping the coreutils version of these programs).

Moving arch to coreutils makes sense to me, but let me look at
util-linux 2.13 before I commit to anything.



Yaakov
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHmUT9piWmPGlmQSMRCLknAJ9uRSEokYrwD2wQJuaGMQn9ZYg9GgCg/c2B
HBRZYH16DcUH6UHjwGUpqzk=
=Xix4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----